Bad Science on Open Science
“Bad Science” is the Ben Goldacre’s column on the Guardian about the frequent misuse of scientific facts in our media. So, his endorsement in favor of citizen science (and of open data too, reported here with a great delay, sorry for that) has a doubled value:
Yes, folk trials would have flaws. They would be “open label”, which is to say, the participants would mostly know what intervention they were getting, of course. But for practical reasons, that’s often the way in proper trials anyway.
A chaotically conducted, randomised folk trial would be, at the very least, a first stab at answering all these questions, with cautious interpretation.
The article continues here.
Events
- 16 Feb 12 - London - The Second London Citizen Cyberscience Summit
- 9 Jun 12 - Roma - SeGiochiFaiScienza
- 29 Oct 12 - Bologna - Smart City Exhibition
- 20 Mar 13 - Kassel - EveryAware Meeting - Kassel, 20-22th March 2013
Recent Comments
- Tania Hayes on Documentation for Air Ambassadors
- p.gravino on Air-quality
- latha bhaskaran on Air-quality
- alfred on Air-quality
- Jessica_P on EveryAware at CeBIT 2014
Tag Cloud
AirProbe International Challenge APIC Antwerp APIC Kassel APIC London APIC Turin awareness brussels CeBIT citizen science crowdsourcing crowdsourcing data validation environment EU events everyaware extreme citizen science fair Fukushima games geographical information geospatial information Germany Google Hannover health indignad@s internet internet and societies Marian Steinbach mobility muki haklay naples nuclear energy occupywallst openstreetmap opinion dynamics opinions paradiso participatory sensing press release publication publications radioactivity societies state of the map sustainability swiftriver UCL Uncategorized ushahidi waste webCategories